Influence of Turbulence, Density, Phase Change, and Phase Interfaces Models on the Performance of the Numerical Simulation of a Two-Phase Closed Thermosyphon

Keywords: Thermosyphon, numerical simulation, heat pipe, phase change, Computational Fluid Dynamics


A heat pipe can be considered a highly effective thermal conduction device, which is especially desirable in heat transfer operations in order to ensure high energy efficiency. However, the operation of heat pipes comprises different heat and mass transfer phenomena, such phase change, heat conduction and convection, solid-liquid and vapor-liquid surface interactions, surface vaporization, and nucleate boiling. Therefore, modelling heat pipes is a highly complex task that demands detailed knowledge of the physical phenomena involved and choosing suitable theoretical models to obtain a good representation of the real nature of the heat and mass transfer processes. In this study, some models and parameters available in the commercial CFD software ANSYS Fluent for turbulence, density, phase change, and phase interfaces were examined to determine their influence on the prediction of the heat and mass transfer in a two-phased closed thermosyphon (TPCT). The numerical results show that using a turbulence viscous model is not necessary and that a variable density model improves the temperature distribution inside the TPCT. Furthermore, using high mass and energy transfer coefficients during condensation makes the vapor remain close to the saturation temperature. Finally, a sharp interphase model is strongly recommended for this type of process.

Author Biographies

David Gamboa*, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, Colombia

Tecnólogo en Electromecánica, Facultad de Ingenierías, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, Medellín- Colombia,

Bernardo Herrera , Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, Colombia

PhD. Engineering, Facultad de Ingenierías, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, Medellín- Colombia,


A. Alizadehdakhel; M. Rahimi; A. Abdulaziz Alsairafi, “CFD modeling of flow and heat transfer in a thermosyphon,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 312–318, Mar. 2010.

B. Fadhl; L. C. Wrobel; H. Jouhara, “Numerical modelling of the temperature distribution in a two-phase closed thermosyphon,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 60, no. 1–2, pp. 122–131, Oct. 2013.

K. Kerrigan; H. Jouhara; G. E. O’Donnell; A. J. Robinson, “Heat pipe-based radiator for low grade geothermal energy conversion in domestic space heating,” Simul. Model. Pract. Theory, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1154–1163, Apr. 2011.

Y.-C. Weng; H.-P. Cho; C. C. Chang; S. L. Chen, “Heat pipe with PCM for electronic cooling,” Appl. Energy, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1825–1833, May 2011.

X. Ping Wu; P. Johnson; A. Akbarzadeh, “Application of heat pipe heat exchangers to humidity control in air-conditioning systems,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 561–568, Jun. 1997.

Z. Xu; Y. Zhang; B. Li; C. C. Wang; Y. Li, “The influences of the inclination angle and evaporator wettability on the heat performance of a thermosyphon by simulation and experiment,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 116, pp. 675–684, Jan. 2018.

K. Kafeel; A. Turan, “Simulation of the response of a thermosyphon under pulsed heat input conditions,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., vol. 80, pp. 33–40, Jun. 2014.

H. Jouhara; B. Fadhl; L. C. Wrobel, “Three-dimensional CFD simulation of geyser boiling in a two- phase closed thermosyphon,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, no. 37, pp. 16463–16476, Oct. 2016.

B. Fadhl; L. C. Wrobel; H. Jouhara, “CFD modelling of a two- phase closed thermosyphon charged with R134a and R404a,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 78, pp. 482–490, Mar. 2015.

K. S. Ong; G. Goh; K. H. Tshai; W. M. Chin, “Thermal resistance of a thermosyphon filled with R410A operating at low evaporator temperature,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 1345–1351, Aug. 2016.

S. ed-D. Fertahi; T. Bouhal; Y. Agrouaz; T. Kousksou; T. El Rhafiki; Y. Zeraouli, “Performance optimization of a two-phase closed thermosyphon through CFD numerical simulations,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 128, pp. 551–563, Jan. 2018.

W.-W. Wang; Y. Cai; R.-Z. Liu; F.-Y. Zhao; D. Liu, “Experimental and numerical investigations of a radial heat pipe for waste heat recovery,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 154, pp. 602– 613, May 2019.

X. Wang; H. Yao; J. Li; Y. Wang; Y. Zhu, “Experimental and numerical investigation on heat transfer characteristics of ammonia thermosyhpons at shallow geothermal temperature,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 136, pp. 1147–1159, Jun. 2019.

J. Cao; G. Pei; M. Bottarelli; C. Chen; D. Jiao; J. Li, “Effect of non-condensable gas on the behaviours of a controllable loop thermosyphon under active control,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 146, pp. 288– 294, Jan. 2019.

M. Azzolin; A. Mariani; L. Moro; A. Tolotto; P. Toninelli; D. Del Col, “Mathematical model of a thermosyphon integrated storage solar collector,” Renew. Energy, vol. 128, no. Part A, pp. 400–415, Dec. 2018.

H. Zhang; S. Shao; C. Tian, “Simulation of the Thermosyphon Free Cooling Mode in an Integrated System of Mechanical Refrigeration and Thermosyphon for Data Centers,” Energy Procedia, vol. 75, pp. 1458–1463, Aug. 2015.

X. Wang; Y. Wang; H. Chen; Y. Zhu, “A combined CFD/visualization investigation of heat transfer behaviors during geyser boiling in two-phase closed thermosyphon,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 121, pp. 703–714, Jun. 2018.

C. W. Hirt; B. D. Nichols, “Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 201–225, Jan. 1981.

J. U.Brackbill; D. B. Kothe; C. Zemach, “A Continuum Method for Modeling Surface Tension,” J. Comput. Phys., pp. 335–354, Vol, 100, no. 2, Jun. 1992.

Y. A. Cengel; M. A. Boles “A Pressure Iteration Scheme for Two-Phase Flow Modeling,” in Computational Methods for Two-Phase Flow and Particle Transport, pp. 61-82, McGrawHill., 1980.

Y. A. Cengel; M. A. Boles, Termodinámica, 7th ed. México, 2009.

R. Mott, Mecánica de fluídos. Pearson: Mexico, 2006.

How to Cite
Gamboa, D., & Herrera , B. (2020). Influence of Turbulence, Density, Phase Change, and Phase Interfaces Models on the Performance of the Numerical Simulation of a Two-Phase Closed Thermosyphon. TecnoLógicas, 23(49), 53-70.


Download data is not yet available.
Research Papers

More on this topic