Selfish or altruistic? A social experiment to promote cooperative behavior in the marketplace
Abstract
Markets are systems composed of complex relationships, and many transactions are usually conducted in anonymity. The dominant economic theory holds that people are completely selfish and individualistic beings. Therefore, in such interactions, anonymous or not, they always try to maximize their earnings, profit, or wellbeing, although, for that purpose, they may act in an uncooperative manner. As a consequence, a question arises: Can altruistic behaviors become common practice in the decisions of the marketplace? A hypothetical case was proposed to the participants in this study: A company must decide its domestic price policy when it can export, at double the price, the same products it is selling in the local market. Subsequently, a survey with a two-stage cluster probability sampling design stratified by income level was conducted. By means of a simple social experiment, this article shows that not all individuals in the market are selfish and people with more altruistic attitudes commonly coexist with them. Finally, subtle experimental interventions promoting more cooperation resulted in an increase in altruistic attitudes.
References
Aguilar Villanueva, L. F. (2015). Gobernanza y gestión pública. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2MlgeDF
Baer, L. & Kauw, M. (2016). Mercado inmobiliario y acceso a la vivienda formal en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, y su contexto metropolitano, entre 2003 y 2013. EURE (Santiago), 42(126), 5-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612016000200001
Bolton, G. E. & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. The American Economic Review, 90(1), 166-193. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.166
Carlsson, F., He, H. & Martinsson, P. (2009). Easy come, easy go: the role of windfall money in lab and field experiments. Recuperado de https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/20794
Dari-Mattiacci, G., Garoupa, N. & Gomez-Pomar, F. (2010). State Liability. European Review of Private Law, 18, 773-811. Recuperado de https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/535?utm_source=scholarship.law.tamu.edu%2Ffacscholar%2F535&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
Davidson, R. J. & Begley, S. (2012). The emotional life of your brain: How its unique patterns affect the way you think, feel, and live – and how you can change them. Wisconsin: Wisconsin-Madison University Press.
Eckel, C. C. & Grossman, P. J. (1996). Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games. Games and economic behavior, 16(2), 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1996.0081
Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. M., (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151
Gangadharan, L., Grossman, P. J., Komai Molle, M., & Vecci, J. (2019). Impact of Social Identity and Inequality on Antisocial Behaviour. European Economic Review, 119, 199-215 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.07.004
Gneezy, U. & List, J. (2014). Lo que importa es el porqué: los motivos económicos ocultos de nuestras acciones. Barcelona: Empresa Activa.
Harvey, D. (2013). Ciudades rebeldes. Del derecho de la ciudad a la revolución urbana. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2YriIqp
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. The Journal of Business, 59(4), 285-300. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/2352761
Maceri, S. (2009). ¿Qué significa ser racional? Sobre el concepto epistemológico de racionalidad crítica. En II Congreso Internacional de Investigación de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina. Recuperado de http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/17228
Maceri, S. (2014). El bienestar comunal como alternativa al fracaso del concepto neoclásico de bienestar. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales, 3(1), 25-37. Recuperado de https://journals.epistemopolis.org/index.php/csociales/article/view/1134
Maceri, S. (2018). ¿La perseverancia ¿paga lo mismo que la inteligencia? Habilidades cognitivas-no cognitivas, comportamientos, educación y maquiavelismo. Buenos Aires: Ediciones cooperativas.
McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V. & Trouard, T. (2001). A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(20), 11832-11835. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211415698
Ortmann, A. & Tichy, L. K. (1999). Gender differences in the laboratory: evidence from prisoner’s dilemma games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39(3), 327-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00038-4
Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics. The American Economic Review, 83(5), 1281-1302. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117561
Rawls, J. (Ed). (2002). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. K. (2011) The Idea of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Smith, A. (1941). Teoría de los sentimientos morales. Colegio de México. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv233mj3
Smith, V. L. (2002). Method in Experiment: Rhetoric and reality. Experimental Economics, 5(2), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020330820698
Sussman, R. W. & Cloninger, C. R. (Eds.) (2011). Origins of altruism and Cooperation. Berlín: Springer Science & Business Media.
Tello, E. (2005). La Historia cuenta: del crecimiento económico al desarrollo humano sostenible. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2YgVS0G
Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Zizzo, D. J. (2010). Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 13(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-009-9230-z
Downloads
