The Onto-Epistemological Enigma of Consciousness. On Transhumanism and the Computational Analogy of the Brain

Keywords: Artificial neuromodulation, digital ontology, mind-brain relationship, computational theory of mind, transhumanism

Abstract

The main purpose of this reflection paper is to present a critical analysis of some of the most prominent epistemological and philosophical ideas developed by contemporary transhumanism in relation to the anatomical-functional activity of the brain and the nature of consciousness. From this point of view, this paper considers whether the technological-instrumental hermeneutic model promoted by the transhumanist movement is an alternative, comprehensive variant to elucidate the onto-epistemological complexity of consciousness. To this end, this paper explores the way in which transhumanism has focused on certain techno-scientific fields in order to develop a concrete prospective associated with the cognitive potentialities of the human being. In this sense, it discusses certain specific advances in cutting-edge neurotechnology and artificial neuromodulation (neural implants, neuromorphic devices, neuronal reprogramming, controlled laboratory culture of cerebroids, etc.), as well as artificial intelligence. This analysis results in deep scepticism as to whether the transhumanist approach offers a promising model for successfully tackling the age-old problem of the mind-brain relationship because, despite the appeal of some of its boldest speculations about the bio-anthropological condition of man and the ontology of the real, it has chosen to update a reductionist and physicalist view of the human mind.

Author Biography

Carlos Hugo Sierra, Universidad de Antioquia

Research professor at Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. Grupo de Investigación en Medicina Transfusional, Tisular y Celular (GIMTTyC), Instituto Distrital de Ciencia, Biotecnología e Innovación en Salud (IDCBIS), Bogotá, Colombia. Email: chugo.sierra@udea.edu.co

References

Agatonović, M. (2021). The fiction of simulation: a critique of Bostrom’s simulation argument. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01312-y

Anders, G. (2011). La Obsolescencia del Hombre. Sobre la Destrucción de la vida en la época de la tercera revolución industrial (Vol. 2). Pre-textos.

Bacon, F. (2011). La Gran Restauración (Novum Organum). Tecnos.

Ball, P. (2012). Contra natura. Sobre la idea de crear seres humanos. Turner Publicaciones.

Bishop, M. P., Elder, S. T., y Heath, R. G. (1963). Intracranial Self-Stimulation in Man. Science, 140(3565), 394-396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.140.3565.394

Bostrom, N. (2003). Are We Living in a Computer Simulation? The Philosophical Quarterly, 53(211), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00309

Bostrom, N. (2017). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.

Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press.

Chalmers, D. J. (2005). The Matrix as Metaphysics. En C. Grau (ed.), Philosophers Explore the Matrix (pp. 132-176). Oxford University Press.

Clarke, A. C. (1973). Profiles of the Future: An Inquiry into the Limits of the Possible. Harper & Row.

Delgado, J. M. R. (1969). Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society. Harper & Row.

Descartes, R. (2009). Meditaciones acerca de la Filosofía Primera. Seguidas de las objeciones y respuestas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Descartes, R. (2011). Discurso del método. Alianza Editorial.

Dessauer, F. (1964). Discusión sobre la técnica. Rialp.

Dijksterhuis, E. J. (1969). The mechanization of the World Picture. Oxford University Press.

Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). What computers Still Can't do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. The MIT Press.

Dreyfus, H. L., y Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over Machine. The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. Free Press.

Du Bois-Reymond, E. (1872). Über die Grenzen des Naturerkennens. Ein Vortrag in der zweiten öffentlichen Sitzung der 45. Versammlung deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte zu Leipzig am 14. August 1872. Veit.

Feigl, H. (1958). The “Mental” and the “Physical”. En H. Feigl, M. Scriven, G. Maxwell (eds.), Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-Body Problem (Vol. 2, pp. 370-497). University of Minnesota Press. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/184614

Finkelstein, G. (2013). Emil du Bois-Reymond. Neuroscience, Self, and Society in Nineteenth-Century Germany. The MIT Press.

Floridi, L. (2009). Against digital ontology. Synthese, 168(1), 151-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9334

Freud, S. (2016). Inhibición, síntoma y angustia. Amorrortu editores.

García Selgas, F. J. (1994). El «cuerpo» como base del sentido de la acción. Reis: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, (68), 41-83. https://doi.org/10.2307/40183757

Gödel, K. (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 38, 173-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01700692

Han, B.-C. (2014). Psicopolítica. Herder Editorial.

Handke, P. (2017). Ensayo sobre el cansancio. Alianza Editorial.

Hochreiter, S., y Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

Huxley, A. (1932). Brave New World. Chatto & Windus.

Jung, C. G., y Kerényi, K. (2004). Introducción a la esencia de la mitología. Ediciones Siruela.

Kim, J. (2000). Mind in a Physical World. An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation. The MIT Press.

Kim, J. (2005). Physicalism, or Something Near Enough. Princeton University Press.

Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Penguin Group.

Larson, E. J. (2021). The Myth of Artificial Intelligence. Why Computers Can’t Think the Way We Do. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Levesque, H. J. (2014). On Our Best Behavior. Artificial Intelligence, 212, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2014.03.007

Linares, J. E. (2019). Adiós a la naturaleza. La revolución bioartefactual. Plaza y Valdés.

Lloyd, S. (2002). Computational Capacity of the Universe. Physical Review Letters, 88(23), 237901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.237901

Lloyd, S. (2006). Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes On the Cosmos. Vintage Books.

Meyrink, G. (2010). El Golem. Plutón ediciones. (Trabajo original publicado en 1915).

Morozov, E. (2015). La locura del solucionismo tecnológico. Clave Intelectual.

Mumford, L. (2016). El pentágono del poder. El mito de la máquina (Vol. 2). Pepitas de Calabaza.

Neumann, J. V. (1966). Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata. University of Illinois Press.

Nöe, A. (2009). Out of Our Heads. Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness. Hill and Wang.

Nordmann, A. (2012). Object lessons: towards an epistemology of technoscience. Scientiae Studia, 10(especial), 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662012000500002

Olds J., y Milner, P. (1954). Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47(6), 419-427. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0058775

Peirce, C. S. (1929). Guessing. The Hound and Horn, 2(3), 267-282.

Putnam, H. (1988). Razón, Verdad e Historia. Tecnos.

Reichenbach, B. R. (1978). Monism and the Possibility of Life after Death. Religious Studies, 14(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500010465

Ryle, G. (2005). El concepto de lo mental. Ediciones Paidós Ibérica.

Sierra, C. H. (2021). Medical imaginaries and the future horizons of consciousness physiology in the work of Stanisław Lem. Rassegna Italiana di argomenti polacchi, (12), 39-53. https://plitonline.it/2021/plit-12-2021-39-53-carlos-hugo-sierra

Sloterdijk, P. (2000). Normas para el parque humano. Una respuesta a la Carta sobre el humanismo de Heidegger. Ediciones Siruela.

Sloterdijk, P. (2012). Haz de cambiar tu vida. Sobre antropotécnica. Pre-Textos.

Smart, J. J. C. (1959). Sensation and Brain Processes. The Philosophical Review, 68(2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182164

Szocik, K., Tkacz, B., y Gulczyński, P. (2020). The revelation of superintelligence. AI & Society, 35(3), 755-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00947-7

Steinhart, E. (2010). Theological Implications of the Simulation Argument. Ars Disputandi, 10(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15665399.2010.10820012

Tallis, R. (2008). The Kingdom of Infinite Space. A Portrait of Your Head. Yale University Press.

Tallis, R. (2016). Aping Mankind. Neuromania, Darwinitis and the misrepresentation of humanity. Routledge.

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433

Vinge, V. (1993). The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-Human Era. Vision 21: Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in the Era of Cyberspace, 11-22. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19940022856

Vogt, C. (1874). Physiologische Briefe für Gebildete aller Stände. Ricker.

Wells, H. G. (1896). The Island of Doctor Moreau. Heinemann.

Zamiatin, E. (1924). We. Dutton.

Zuse, K. (1969). Rechnender Raum. Friedrich Vieweg & Sohn.

How to Cite
Sierra, C. H. (2023). The Onto-Epistemological Enigma of Consciousness. On Transhumanism and the Computational Analogy of the Brain. Trilogía Ciencia Tecnología Sociedad, 15(29), e2458. https://doi.org/10.22430/21457778.2458

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2023-01-30
Section
Thematic Dossier

Altmetric

Crossref Cited-by logo