Reflexiones sobre la gobernanza financiera global. Innovación de pocos y mal de muchos
Abstract
We start a reflexive process on the global financial architecture after the crisis of 2008. Instead of the quick reactions of our politicians, we proposes to raise the importance of analyzing the contradictions of the financial system, it will be a path to a political practice that includes citizen participation in the global processes decision. We propose reconciliation between Science, Technology and Society to prevent recurrence. We propose a new symbiosis between politics, markets and civil society, allowing the emergence of new global financial governance.
References
Adam, B., & van Loon, J. (2000). Introduction: repositioning risk; the challenge for social theory. In B. Adam, U. Beck & J. van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond: critical issues for social theory (pp. 1-31). London: Sage.
Alexander, K., Eatwell, J., Persaud, A., & Reoch, R. (2007). Financial Supervision and Crisis Management in the EU. Retrieved. from.
Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate: Oxford University Press, USA.
Beck, U. (1992a). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity: Sage.
Beck, U. (1995). Ecological politics in an age of risk. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1998). ¿Qué es la globalización?: Falacias del globalismo, respuestas a la globalización: Paidos.
Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization? : Polity.
Beck, U. (2006). Risk society revisited. The Sociology of Risk And Gambling Reader, 61.
Beck, U. (1992b). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.: Londres, Sage.
Benhabib, S. (1986). Critique, norm, and utopia: A study of the foundations of critical theory: Columbia University Press.
Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era: Princeton University Press.
Berrío, J. G. R. (2009). Un Modelo de Gobernanza para Gestionar el Riesgo. Revista Trilogía, Volumen 1, 95-110.
Bowman, D. M., & Hodge, G. A. (2006). Nanotechnology: Mapping the wild regulatory frontier. Futures, 38(9), 1060-1073.
Castel, R. (1991). From dangerousness to risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 281-298). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Conway, E. (2009). IMF puts total cost of crisis at £7.1 trillion. Telegraph, London.
Dean, M. (1999). Risk, calculable and incalculable. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives (pp. 131-159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. An analysis of the concepts of pollution and danger: London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Dupuy, J. P. (2007). Some Pitfalls in the Philosophical Foundations of Nanoethics. Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 32(3), 237.
Dupuy, J. P., & Grinbaum, A. (2004). Living with Uncertainty: Toward the Ongoing Normative Assessment of Nanotechnology. Techné, 8, 4-25.
Echeverría, J. (2005). Gobernanza de las nanotecnologías. Documento de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, Instituto de Filosofía, CSIC.
Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 15(2), 226.
Gordon, C., Burchell, G., & Miller, P. (1991). The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. London: Wheatsheaf.
Hull, J. C. (2009). Introducción a los mercados de futuros y opciones: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
Kemp, R., Parto, S., & Gibson, R. B. (2005). Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 12-30.
Klinke, A., Dreyer, M., Renn, O., Stirling, A., & Van Zwanenberg, P. (2006). Precautionary Risk Regulation in European Governance. Journal of Risk Research, 9(4), 373-392.
Marchant, G. E., Sylvester, D. J., & Abbott, K. W. (2008). Risk Management Principles for Nanotechnology. NanoEthics, 2(1), 43-60.
Mythen, G. (2004). Ulrich Beck: A Critical Introduction to the Risk Society. London: Pluto Press.
Olivé, L. (2004). Riesgo, ética y participación pública. In J. Luján & J. Echeverría (Eds.), Gobernar los riesgos. Ciencia y valores en la sociedad del riesgo, (pp. 289-309). Madrid: editorial Biblioteca Nueva-OEI.
Renn, O., & Roco, M. C. (2006). Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(2), 153-191.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1976). The process of creative destruction. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy,81-86.
Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism: WW Norton & Co Inc.
Sennett, R., & Najmías, D. (2000). La corrosión del carácter: Las consecuencias personales del trabajo en el nuevo capitalismo: Editorial Anagrama.
Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1991). Risk and rationality:University of California Press Berkeley.
Sierra, M. C. P. (2009). Gobernanza de la Ciencia y la Tecnología Revista Trilogía, Volumen 1, 155-170.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280-285.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2006). Making globalization work: WW Norton.
Van Loon, J. (2002). Risk and technological culture: towards a sociology of virulence: Routledg.
