Discourses on Open Access by chilean scientists

  • Pablo Cárcamo ONG Derechos Digitales
  • Klaus Lehmann Meléndez ONG Derechos Digitales
Keywords: Open Access, scientific journals, scientific capital, publication patterns

Abstract

This research explores the discourses on the circuit of production and circulation of scientific knowledge of consolidated Chilean academics through a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews. It elaborates on the relationship with the national circuit of scientific journals and the discourses about Open Access journals. It is found that the publication in Open Access journals has characteristics that increases uncertainty in the construction of academic capital and that the structure of scientific production in Chile does not provide any incentive for researchers to change their established patterns of publication.

Author Biographies

Pablo Cárcamo, ONG Derechos Digitales
Licenciado en Sociología, ONG Derechos Digitales, Santiago de Chile
Klaus Lehmann Meléndez, ONG Derechos Digitales
Licenciado en Sociología, ONG Derechos Digitales, Santiago de Chile

References

Babini, D... (2011). Acceso abierto a la producción científica de América Latina y El Caribe: identificación de principales instituciones para estrategias de integración regional. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, CTS,6(17).

Bourdieu, P. (2002). Campo de poder, campo intelectual. Itinerario de un concepto. Buenos Aires: Editorial Montressor.

Bourdieu, P. (1994). El campo científico. Redes: revista de estudios sociales de la ciencia, 1(2), 131-159.

Castro N., L. y Castro N., M. (2012). Cuestiones de metodología cualitativa. Empiria. Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, (4), 165-192.

Herb, U. (2010). Sociological implications of scientific publishing: Open access, science, society, democracy and the digital divide. Disponible en: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2599/2404.

Nariani, R., y Fernández, L. (2012). Open access publishing: what authors want. College & Research Libraries, 73(2), 182-195.

Ruiz R., J. (2009). Sociological Discourse Analysis: Methods and Logic. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(2), Art. 26, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0902263.

Schroter, S., T., L., & Smith, R. (2005). Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 330(7494), 756.

Suber, P. (2004). Praising progress, preserving precision. SPARC Open Access News letter (77). Disponible en http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/09-02-04.htm

Vessuri, H., Guédon, J. C., & Cetto, A. M. (2013). Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development. Current Sociology.

How to Cite
Cárcamo, P., & Lehmann Meléndez, K. (2014). Discourses on Open Access by chilean scientists. Trilogía Ciencia Tecnología Sociedad, 6(11), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.22430/21457778.497

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2014-12-17
Section
Articles

Altmetric

Crossref Cited-by logo