Extracción de conocimiento a partir del glosario Léxico Extendido del Lenguaje utilizando Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural
Resumen
Un desarrollo de software exitoso necesita buenas especificaciones, es decir, requerimientos correctos, consistentes y no ambiguos. Los artefactos en lenguaje natural son la herramienta más utilizada para escribir especificaciones; sin embargo, el uso del lenguaje natural puede introducir muchos defectos: ambigüedad, vaguedad y generalidad. Por lo tanto, el objetivo de este artículo es brindar un enfoque para escribir buenas especificaciones y extraer conocimiento de ellas. El enfoque propuesto utiliza un léxico particular, el glosario Léxico Extendido del Lenguaje (LEL). Y sugiere reglas para extraer conocimientos (conceptos, atributos y relaciones) de él. Este artículo también presenta un prototipo que implementa y apoya el enfoque propuesto, así como también una evaluación preliminar del enfoque. En conclusión, el enfoque propuesto representa una contribución teoría, que fue evaluada utilizando el System Usability Scale y sus resultados son prometedores, ya que obtuvo la calificación máxima.
Referencias bibliográficas
Boehm, “Software Engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. C-25, no. 12, pp. 1226-1241, Dec. 1976. https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.1976.1674590
S. L. Lim, and A. Finkelstein, “StakeRare: Using Social Networks and Collaborative Filtering for Large-Scale Requirements Elicitation,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 707-735, May-June 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2011.36
C. Potts, “Using schematic scenarios to understand user needs,” in Proc. of the confe. on Desig. Inter. Syst. processes, practices, methods, & techniques - DIS ’95, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1995, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/225434.225462
D. M. Berry, E. Kamsties, and M. M. Krieger, From Contract Drafting to Software Specification: Linguistic Sources of Ambiguity, v1.0. (2003). Accessed: Sep. 25, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~dberry/handbook/ambiguityHandbook.pdf
K. Pohl, “The three dimensions of requirements engineering: A framework and its applications,” Inf. Syst., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 243–258, Apr. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4379(94)90044-2
A. Hall, “Seven myths of formal methods,” IEEE Software, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 11-19, Sep. 1990. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.57887
Hoare, “An overview of some formal methods for program design,” Computer (Long Beach Calif.), vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 85–91, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.1987.1663697
L. M. Cysneiros, and J. C. Sampaio do Prado Leite, “Using the Language Extended Lexicon to Support Non-Functional Requirements Elicitation,” in Anais do WER01 - Workshop em Engenharia de Requisitos, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2001. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221235247_Using_the_Language_Extended_Lexicon_to_Support_Non-Functional_Requirements_Elicitation
Z. S. Harris, “Co-Occurrence and Transformation in Linguistic Structure,” Language, vol. 33, no. 3, p. 283, Apr. 1957. https://doi.org/10.2307/411155
N. Chomsky. “The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory,” Plenum Press, p. 573, 1975. https://dingo.sbs.arizona.edu/~langendoen/ReviewOfChomskyLSLT.pdf
L. Antonelli, M. Lezoche, and J. Delle Ville, “A Method to obtain a Knowledge Representation from a Natural Language Specification of the Domain using the Glossary LEL,” Presented at the Decissioning 2023, Popayan, Jun. 2023. https://host170.sedici.unlp.edu.ar/server/api/core/bitstreams/41a01f6d-54e6-4039-9056-996a6b47f50a/content
J. C. S. do P. Leite, and A. P. M. Franco, “A strategy for conceptual model acquisition,” in [1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, San Diego, CA, USA, 1993, pp. 243-246. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRE.1993.324851
A. V. Vu, and M. Ogawa, “Formal semantics extraction from natural language specifications for ARM,” in Formal Methods – The Next 30 Years, M. H. ter Beek, A. McIver, and J. Oliveira, Eds., Switzerland: Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30942-8_28
S. Geetha, and G.S.A. Mala, “Extraction of key attributes from natural language requirements specification text,” in IET Chennai Fourth International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Intelligent Systems (SEISCON 2013), Chennai, India, 2013, p. 374-379. https://doi.org/10.1049/IC.2013.0341
F. Bargui, H. Ben-Abdallah, and J. Feki, “Multidimensional concept extraction and validation from OLAP requirements in NL,” in 2009 International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering, Dalian, China, 2009, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/NLPKE.2009.5313769
J. Kuchta, and P. Padhiyar, “Extracting Concepts from the Software Requirements Specification Using Natural Language Processing,” in 2018 11th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI), Gdansk, Poland, 2018, pp. 443-448. https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2018.8431221
Y. Rigou, D. Lamontagne, and I. Khriss, “A Sketch of a Deep Learning Approach for Discovering UML Class Diagrams from System’s Textual Specification,” in 2020 1st International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET), Meknes, Morocco, 2020, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IRASET48871.2020.9092144
Y. Shen, and T. Breaux, “Domain Model Extraction from User-authored Scenarios and Word Embeddings,” in 2022 IEEE 30th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), Melbourne, Australia, 2022, pp. 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1109/REW56159.2022.00036
P. Szwed, “Concepts extraction from unstructured Polish texts: a rule based approach,” in Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Lodz, Poland, 2015. https://doi.org/10.15439/2015F280
M. Li et al., “Automated Extraction of Requirement Entities by Leveraging LSTM-CRF and Transfer Learning,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), Adelaide, SA, Australia, 2020, pp. 208-219. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME46990.2020.00029
Y. Wang, “Semantic information extraction for software requirements using semantic role labeling,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing (PIC), Nanjing, China, 2015, pp. 332-337. https://doi.org/10.1109/PIC.2015.7489864
D. Sadoun, C. Dubois, Y. Ghamri-Doudane, and B. Grau, “From Natural Language Requirements to Formal Specification Using an Ontology,” in 2013 IEEE 25th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Herndon, VA, USA, 2013, pp. 755-760. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2013.116
A. Schlutter, and A. Vogelsang, “Knowledge extraction from natural language requirements into a semantic relation graph,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops, New York, NY, USA, 2020, pp. 373-379. https://doi.org/10.1145/3387940.3392162
Y. An et al., “Exploring Pre-Trained Language Models to Build Knowledge Graph for Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs),” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Osaka, Japan, 2022, pp. 3651-3658. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10020568
C. Arora, M. Sabetzadeh, L. Briand, and F. Zimmer, “Extracting domain models from natural-language requirements: Approach and industrial evaluation”, in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 19th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, Saint-Malo, 2016, pp. 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1145/2976767.2976769
G. Van Rossum. Python. v3.12.3. Accessed: Mar. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.python.org/
A. Holovaty, and S. Willison. Django. v5.0.4. Accessed: Mar. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.djangoproject.com/
A. Ronacher. Flask, v3.0.3. Accessed: Mar. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://flask.palletsprojects.com/
M. Honnibal, and I. Montani. Spacy. v3.0. Accessed: Mar. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://spacy.io/
S. Bird, E. Klein, and E. Loper. NLTK. v3.11. Accessed: Mar. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nltk.org/
A. Roques, PlantUML, v1.2024.4. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://plantuml.com/
J. Brooke, “SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale,” in Usability evaluation in industry, 1st ed. United Kingdom, CRC Press, 1996. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781498710411-35/sus-quick-dirty-usability-scale-john-brooke
J. Brooke, “SUS: a retrospective,” Journal of user experience, vol. 8, no. 2, pp.29-40, 2013. https://uxpajournal.org/sus-a-retrospective/
A. Bangor, P. T. Kortum, and J. T. Miller, “An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 574–594, Jul. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776
J. Nielsen, “Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 385–397, Sep. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1994.1065
S. McLellan, A. Muddimer, and S. Camille Peres, “The effect of experience on System Usability Scale ratings,” Journal of user experience, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 56-67, 2012. https://uxpajournal.org/the-effect-of-experience-on-system-usability-scale-ratings/
Descargas
Derechos de autor 2024 TecnoLógicas
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Métricas
