Research evaluation and university rankings, beyond citations and impact factor

Keywords: university rankings, research metrics, academic research, academic classifiers

Abstract

Research evaluation is currently one of the most relevant and controversial topics in science and academia, especially in the university environment. This evaluation is commonly used to classify institutions, groups, academic products such as scientific journals, and research teaching staff. Research quality and impact indicators decisively influence advancement in academic careers, selection of scholarship and incentive beneficiaries, completion of high-level programs (such as master's degrees and doctorates), allocation of resources in institutions and research centers, and in the definition of public policies at the institutional and governmental level [1], [2].

Author Biography

Gloria Mercedes Díaz Cabrera, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, Colombia

Facultad de Ingenierías, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, Medellín - Colombia, gloriadiaz@itm.edu.co

References

D. Moher, F. Naudet, I. A. Cristea, F. Miedema, J. P. A. Ioannidis, and S. N. Goodman, “Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure,” PLoS Biol., vol. 16, no. 3, p. e2004089, Mar. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089

S. Marginson, “Global university rankings: Implications in general and for Australia,” J. High. Educ. Policy Manag., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 131–142, Apr. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800701351660

Shanghai Ranking. “Shanghai Ranking's Academic Ranking of World Universities Methodology 2023.” shanghairanking.com. Accessed: Apr. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.shanghairanking.com/methodology/arwu/2023

S. Chivers. “World University Rankings 2024: Methodology.” timeshighereducation.com. Accessed: Apr. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/world-university-rankings-2024-methodology

C. Ocallaghan. “QS World University Rankings methodology: Using rankings to start your university search.” topuniversities.com. Accessed: Apr. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodology

SCImago. “Ranking Methodology.” scimagoir.com. Accessed: Apr. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.scimagoir.com/methodology.php

The Reporters. “Impact Rankings 2023: methodology.” timeshighereducation.com. Accessed: Apr. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/impact-rankings-2023-methodology

U-Multirank's. “U-Multirank's approach to university rankings.” Accessed: Apr. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.umultirank.org/about/methodology/our-approach/

D. Hicks, P. Wouters, L. Waltman, S. de Rijcke, and I. Rafols, “Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics,” Nature, vol. 520, no. 7548, pp. 429–431, Apr. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

DORA. “San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment.” sfdora.org. Accessed: Apr. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sfdora.org/read/

CoARA. “The Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment.” Accessed: Apr. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://coara.eu/agreement/the-agreement-full-text/

Barcelona Declaration. “Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information.” Accessed: Apr. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://barcelona-declaration.org/

How to Cite
[1]
G. M. Díaz Cabrera, “Research evaluation and university rankings, beyond citations and impact factor”, TecnoL., vol. 27, no. 59, p. e3103, Apr. 2024.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2024-04-30
Section
Editorial

Altmetric

Crossref Cited-by logo